Hi,
Quoting Antonin Delpeuch (2026-01-05 13:55:29)
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I'm interested in continuing this work. My conclusion is that it's
> not so much more work to package the full "uv" instead of just
> "uv_build". I'm hoping to upload it to experimental in the coming month.
> Upload to unstable will remain blocked by various dependencies still in
> the NEW queue.
>
> Unless Emmanuel shouts I would reassign myself the "uv" ITP in the
> coming days.
Please reassign. Also, it would be great if you can maintain update us
how the package is going. I'm busy but if you have some
issues/problems just ping me/us.
Thanks for that!
>
> Best,
>
> Antonin
>
> On 05/01/2026 12:41, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > some of my packages migrated to use uv/uv_build and I'm now blocked
> > from uploading newer upstream releases.
> >
> > What's the status of this bug? Are you still interested, will it be
> > uploaded anytime soon?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Daniel
cheers,
Emmanuel Arias
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ [email protected]
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5 FA9DEC5DE11C63F1
⠈⠳⣄
