On 2026-01-16 10:42, Christian Kastner wrote: > Though a bit of work, that might actually be the simplest solution to > keeping ppc64el rocblas, hipblas and rocfft.
I forgot to say: even if technically possible, the AMD folks might still prefer not to maintain ppc64el packages, because new issues might still pop up and we're back to square one. >From experience, I myself tend to be very conservative about what architectures to support. Best, Christian
