Control: close -1# Because I filed this bug myself, I decided to use this command; don't imitate lightly
Hi Trupti, On 1/16/26 10:00, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Le mercredi 14 janvier 2026 à 20:29 +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :On 1/14/26 20:05, Sébastien Villemot wrote:Paul: if my statement above is correct, what would be the right course of action?The right action would be to get those pacakges fixed, e.g. via filing bugs (cloning and reassigning might be appropriate). When the bugs are in place, I can hint src:openblas into testing.Thanks, this has been done by Trupti.
After hitting the sent button, I realized I hadn't been overly explicit. Let me try to explain what I had in mind. As we now consider the bugs to lie in the other packages, after the reassigning there shouldn't be a bug against src:openblas anymore. This bug is (until my close trickles through) blocking migration. It is also no longer actionable by the openblas maintainers. If I had done the bug management, I would have first fixed metadata (removal of current affects, removal of help tag) and then reassigned the two clones and the original. Also please be aware that the maintainers of the packages you reassign bugs to only get a mail from the bts with the results of the control commands. It is considered courtesy to CC them on the reassign message (e.g. by using <package>@packages.debian.org) with a short explanation for the reassign.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
