On Wednesday, 21 January 2026, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 22:36:47 -0500 Sergio Durigan Junior > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Monday, 19 January 2026, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > ... > >> > I tested on Fedora42, Loongnix25 and Debian for LoongArch64, the test >> > passed, so I think there may be some differences for the build system >> > environment, please check or install the latest Debian system if >> > possible. >> Thanks for testing and providing more details. >> Am I correct to assume that the problem is not reproducible with the >> latest unstable? > > Yes, I can not reproduce the problem with the upstream mainline [1], > upstream 17.1 [2], debian 17.1-1 [3] and debian 17.1-2 [4] code with > the same test steps [5] on the debian system [6]. > > (1) upstream mainline > git clone https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git gdb > cd gdb > git checkout master > cd .. > > (2) upstream 17.1 > git clone https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git gdb > cd gdb > git checkout gdb-17.1-release > cd .. > > (3) debian 17.1-1 > git clone https://salsa.debian.org/gdb-team/gdb.git gdb > cd gdb > git checkout debian/17.1-1 > cd .. > > (4) debian 17.1-2 > git clone https://salsa.debian.org/gdb-team/gdb.git gdb > cd gdb > git checkout debian/17.1-2 > cd .. > > (5) test steps > rm -rf build && mkdir -p build && cd build > ../gdb/configure > make -j"$(nproc)" > make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp" > make check-gdb RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-gdbserver" > TESTS="gdb.base/breakpoint-in-ro-region.exp" > > (6) debian system > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/snapshots/2025-12-06/debian-13.0.0-loong64-NETINST-1.iso
Thanks for the extra info! OK, then let's wait for the loongarch64 builders to be redeployed and see if that solves the issue. Cheers, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
