Hi Andrew,
Am Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:02:16AM +1000 schrieb Andrew Pollock:
> > Thanks for pointing this out. That workaround may indeed still exist.
> > However, I am not convinced that this alone justifies keeping lwn4chrome
> > in Debian going forward (cc: Andrew Pollock as upstream).
> >
> Thanks for looping me in.
:-)
> > I'm happy to hear other views, but this is why I currently lean towards
> > dropping it from the archive.
> >
> My website infrastructure is a bit of a mess at the moment and I haven't
> been able to prioritise working on fixing that. I could relocate the
> upstream for this extension to GitHub though,
IMHO the less effort way to deal with this.
> and while I'm at it resolve
> any outstanding issues with the extension functioning desirably.
This would be really helpful. It would be great if you ping here.
IMHO it would be also a good idea to migrate the Debian packaging
to the Debian team on Salsa when upgrading the package.
> I hadn't
> realised it had been packaged for Debian...
LOL
Thanks a lot for stepping in
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
