On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 3:15 PM Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote: > What is your proposal, to be clear? Packaging google-cloud as a > separate package, even if severely stripped down, is fine. I wouldn't > vendor any of these files, these aren't small or trivial packages...
I relized I was wrong. Even the upstream provides a git tag as `auth/v0.17.0`. It still contains the whole google-cloud source package. Sure, I wouldn't vendor any of these files. So, it seems severely stripped down would be the way to go. Best regards, -Andrew
