On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:16:18PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 17:17]: > > Package: libparse-recdescent-perl > > Version: 1.94.free-1 > > Severity: minor > > > > debian/changelog suggests that the tutorial that used to be part of > > the package has been removed and put into non-free into a dedicated > > package parse-recdescent-doc-nonfree. This package is, however, not > > present in non-free today. > > Indeed, the package was never uploaded, although I thought I have done it > after this discussion in debian-mentors: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/09/msg00334.html > > The non-free tutorial package will be uploaded soon and will be called > libparse-recdescent-perl-tutorial-nonfree.
That would be great. > > Additionally, it would be a good idea to have the removed > > documentation mentioned in the package description and not only the > > change log. > > Do you think that there is appropriate to advertise non-free packages in > the description of packages in main? I'd think that would be perfectly OK. > I do not really care, but this > strikes me as being politically incorrect... I already mentioned it in: > > /usr/share/doc/libparse-recdescent-perl/NEWS.Debian.gz Yes, that's where I found the reference. > Although, it might be a good idea to drop a note into README.Debian. > What do you think? I'd put it in there, yes. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
