I forgot the 'verb' in this example - adding now to avoid
any confusion:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 06:43:37PM +0000, Andrew Bower wrote:
> > ===> /usr/sbin/facility <===
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> >
> > use strict;
> > use File::Basename;
> > use File::Glob qw(bsd_glob);
> >
> > my $svdir = $ENV{SVDIR} // "/etc/service";
> > my $command = shift or die "usage: $0 command facility...";
> > my %providers = map {
> > map {
> > basename(dirname($_)) => 1
> > } bsd_glob("$svdir/*/provides-$_")
> > } @ARGV;
> >
> > exec ("sv", $command, keys %providers) if %providers;
>
> I think for 'facility check' one might need to be able to define whether
> we want an AND or OR relationship - the default 'sv' behaviour would be
> to AND them together, whereas for some types of facility we may be
> content with any one passing, so we could have something like:
>
> facility --any network
facility --any check network
> which would then have to explode into one 'sv' invocation for each
> discovered provider and then OR the results together.