On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 01:56:49PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to po/sv.gmo: binary file > contents changed > dpkg-source: error: add po/sv.gmo in debian/source/include-binaries if you > want to store the modified binary in the debian tarball > dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: > po/stamp-po > dpkg-source: error: unrepresentable changes to source > dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess failed with exit status > 1 > `--- > > But I'm unsure, whether the info after the errors and then the final > error might be confusing, and might be worth some rewording somewhere.
Would it make sense to have such info to be really an error? Or maybe the info has to be info according to some style document or design principle? If this is the case, then let the info continue to be info. As an end user I don't really mind, the goal of providing all the information is achieved either way. Thanks.
