For documentation purposes: It seemed easier, or the same amount of work, to close this report, and start fresh. The minor, trivial, tiny issue, or so I believe, is at [bug #1127398](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1127398). It could be that replacing BSD with BSB was deliberate. I can't tell.
- Bug#1127395: Does AUTHORS file mentions BSB instead of BSD? u34
- Bug#1127395: reassign inetutils u34
- Bug#1127395: minor, tiny, trivial issue: bug #1127398 is instead ... u34
