On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:30:23PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 12:06:36AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > If a package written in C FTBFS with gcc-15, and it has foo.c and > > bar.c, both of which requiring a fix, and the maintainer fixes foo.c > > only (as only foo.c appears in the build log) would you say that it's > > wrong to reopen because now it fails for a "different" reason? (bar.c) > > Yes.
Well, I think nobody would do that. If a package FTBFS with gcc-15, everybody would understand that the bug is only fixed when the package builds again with gcc-15, not when only the first foo.c is fixed. > > BTW: I'm building subversion by adding this single file to debian/clean > > > > subversion/tests/cmdline/.davautocheck.sh.stop > > I'm seeing a failure completely unrelated to that, so I doubt it will > be enough. Well, my build succeeded after adding the above line. What's the failure you see on your end? Thanks.
