[Hector Cao] > -runlevel > runlevel > +if command -v systemctl >/dev/null 2>&1 && [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then > + systemctl list-units --type=target --state=active > runlevel > +elif command -v runlevel >/dev/null 2>&1; then > + runlevel > runlevel > +fi
I believe this is the wrong approach. The systemctl command is not presenting the current runlevel, it is presenting something else, and it belong in a diffferent file name. If the runlevel command do not exist, the runlevel file should not be created. Changing the content of well known files place too much guesswork on the client code parsing the collected information. -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
