On 2026-02-10 09:46:58 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I'd be happy to consider looking at any concrete bugs you encounter;
> but comparing two different commands* and saying they behave differently
> isn't very helpful.
> 
> * apt upgrade is roughly apt-get upgrade --with-new-pkgs;
>   apt-get upgrade is roughly apt upgrade --without-new-pkgs;
>   but of course there are more differences, and the interface
>   is versioned now; see apt-config dump | grep ^Version for all
>   features enabled in 1.0 and newer (apt-get is the 0.x compat mode)

It seems that [] is actually obscure. For instance:

disset:~> apt-get install -s openssh-client openssh-server openssh-sftp-server
NOTE: This is only a simulation!
      apt-get needs root privileges for real execution.
      Keep also in mind that locking is deactivated,
      so don't depend on the relevance to the real current situation!
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Solving dependencies... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  openssh-client openssh-server openssh-sftp-server
3 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded.
Inst openssh-sftp-server [1:10.0p1-8] (1:10.2p1-3 Debian:testing, 
Debian:unstable [amd64]) []
Inst openssh-server [1:10.0p1-8] (1:10.2p1-3 Debian:testing, Debian:unstable 
[amd64]) []
Inst openssh-client [1:10.0p1-8] (1:10.2p1-3 Debian:testing, Debian:unstable 
[amd64])
Conf openssh-sftp-server (1:10.2p1-3 Debian:testing, Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf openssh-server (1:10.2p1-3 Debian:testing, Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf openssh-client (1:10.2p1-3 Debian:testing, Debian:unstable [amd64])

but I don't understand why there are breaks for openssh-sftp-server
and openssh-server.

Using "-o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true" does not show additional
information.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Reply via email to