Control: severity -1 minor
Thanks

On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:22:24 +0100 Christian Marillat <[email protected]> wrote:

> |  trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man7/wlog.7.gz', which is also in 
package libwinpr2-2t64:amd64 (2.11.7+dfsg1-6)
> | Errors were encountered while processing:
> |  /var/cache/apt/archives/libwinpr3-3_3.22.0+dfsg-2_amd64.deb

libwinpr2-2t64 is not in debian trixie.
We had libwinpr2-2 in bookworm, and we did t64 transition during
bookworm->trixie upgrade, which didn't touch freerdp2 - it was
freerdp3 already.

Why Trixie ?

libwinpr2-2t64 is a Debian package

Ok, this makes sense.  I don't see recent versions of freerdp2 in
d/changelog since freerdp3 were split off freerdp2 during trixie
development cycle, and development continued in parallel, and
meanwhile freerdp2 undergoed the t64 transition, and later has
been removed.

,----
| $ apt-cache show libwinpr2-2t64
| Package: libwinpr2-2t64
| Status: install ok installed

https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libwinpr2-2t64&searchon=names&suite=stable&section=all

there's no freerdp2 in trixie.  There's no libwinpr2-2t64 in oldstable,
oldstable had libwinpr2-2 only - for which I'm adding a Replaces.

> I guess it was in some flavour of ubuntu?

I don't use Ubuntu

so yeah, my thought about ubuntu was wrong: this package has been
present for some time during trixie development cycle, between the
t64 transition and removal of freerdp2 from trixie.  It's not from
ubuntu but from debian sid/testing.  It has never been a part of any
debian release.

> I probably should conflict with libwinpr2-2 package here, but even
> there, libwinpr2-2 is not part of trixie.  And trixie release notes
> states to remove obsolete packages.  If that package is there, it
> means the user didn't follow the release notes.  So even if the bug
> might be there, it's definitely of less severity.

> I'm adding a Replaces for the non-t64 package.  I've no idea where
> you've got the t64 one.

From Debian :
> ,----
> | $ rmadison freerdp2
> | freerdp2   | 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u1  | oldoldstable       | source
> | freerdp2   | 2.3.0+dfsg1-2+deb11u1  | oldoldstable-debug | source
> | freerdp2   | 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 | oldstable          | source
> | freerdp2   | 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 | oldstable-debug    | source
> `----

Sure.  Please read what I wrote.  I especially noted libwinpr2-2t64
variant, the t64 suffix, - this is what prompted me to think about
ubuntu. t64 had happened after bookworm, for trixie, there were no
libwinpr2-2t64 in oldstable, only libwinpr2-2 (without the t64 suffix).

I'm fixing that by replacing both variants of libwinpr2-2, just in case
someone installed a mix of stable and testing packages, but it it is
still a bug of a low severity, since the user clearly did something that
is not recommended.

It would be interesting to know how you ended up having libwinpr2-2t64
(with the t64 suffix) on an oldstable system.

Thanks,

/mjt

Reply via email to