Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hey, we are now in 2026 so this is open since more than 10 years now :( I would like to fix this. Unfortunately I do not understand why this patch fix the usage on hurd.
Can you explain why this fixes the issue? Actually you need to convince upstream to add your patch. I want to have a minimal diff with upstream, that's why I would only include it in Debian if upstream accepts the patch. I can also forward a MR, but without being able to explain it does not make sense to forward a MR. https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/torsocks/-/merge_requests Regards, hefee -- On Donnerstag, 20. Juli 2017 11:58 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [intrigeri 2014] > > > Hi David, > > > > could you please have a look at this Debian bug report: > > https://bugs.debian.org/767235 > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > [Dropping the "patch" tag, as it seems unclear that the patch actually > > does the right thing.] > > As far as I can tell, the tsocks_syscall() function is not used on Hurd, > thus failing to hijack connect(), close(), socket() and several other > system calls.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
