Hi Daniel, Am Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 12:58:45PM -0500 schrieb Daniel Echeverri: > Thank you for reaching out, Andreas.
Thanks to you for the prompt response. > I have to admit that I was not responding because I was not entirely sure > how to proceed in this case. I appreciate you opening this discussion. > > Feel free to move it to the Phototools team, I have no problem with that. Done and uploaded. > My Salsa login is epsilon. You are a member now. > That said, I wanted to ask your opinion, > given that sxiv was explicitly abandoned by its original > upstream, and that nsxiv exists precisely because of that, does it really > make sense in the long term to keep both packages in Debian? Probably the package should be retired sooner or later. I simply think as long as popcon of sxiv is just higher than nsxiv it makes sense to keep it for a while (maybe one further release?) I guess its an effect of users are just used to this name. This was the idea of using an alternative and at the same time filing #1128391. I consider to suggest the maintainer of nsxiv to join the Phototools team as well and use the alternative as well. > P.S. Feel free to do the same with tintii. Thank you - I'll do so in the next couple of days. Thanks a lot for your cooperation Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de
