On Sat, 2026-02-21 at 12:15 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:49:02PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > reassign 1124549 libvirt 7.0.0-3+deb11u3 > > Bug #1124549 [src:linux] libvirt passes invalid flags for network interface > > deletion > > Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'libvirt'. > > No longer marked as found in versions linux/5.10.247-1. > > Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1124549 to the same values > > previously set > > Bug #1124549 [libvirt] libvirt passes invalid flags for network interface > > deletion > > There is no source info for the package 'libvirt' at version > > '7.0.0-3+deb11u3' with architecture '' > > Unable to make a source version for version '7.0.0-3+deb11u3' > > Marked as found in versions 7.0.0-3+deb11u3. > > Ben, > > based on the fact that you reassigned the bug to libvirt, I > understand that you are not going to address this in the kernel. Is > that correct?
Correct. > To be honest I'm not particularly interested in pursuing updates to > oldoldstable, especially considering that it'll be out of LTS support > in just a few months. > > Does anyone know if there's a way to flag the LTS folks so that they > will take a look and consider whether to take a bug on? Otherwise I'd > be inclined to just close this and invite users affected by the issue > to move to a supported release. I or another member of the LTS team will take care of this. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings - Debian developer, member of kernel, installer and LTS teams
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
