Package: reuse Version: 5.0.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #1116303 X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear Maintainer, I wish to express the same desire. I noticed some differences in the output of reuse with the current version vs the version I ran on my Mac. Currently reuse sits at an easy 6.2.0 as seen on their codeberg repo: https://codeberg.org/fsfe/reuse-tool/src/tag/v6.2.0 It would be appreciated if a new version lands on unstable (and potentially hits backports). -- System Information: Debian Release: forky/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'experimental'), (10, 'stable-updates'), (10, 'stable-security'), (10, 'oldstable-security'), (10, 'oldoldstable'), (10, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.18.12+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages reuse depends on: ii python3 3.13.9-3 ii python3-attr 25.4.0-1 ii python3-binaryornot 0.4.4+git20230412.ac4f56e+dfsg-2 ii python3-boolean 5.0-1 ii python3-click 8.2.0+0.really.8.1.8-1 ii python3-debian 1.1.0 ii python3-jinja2 3.1.6-1 ii python3-license-expression 30.4.1-1 ii python3-tomlkit 0.13.3-2 reuse recommends no packages. reuse suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
