Quoting [email protected] (2026-02-28 10:31:14) > The Debian NEW review of rust-io-timer 0.0.1+ds-1 has been completed. > > Decision: ACCEPTED > Reviewer: Andrew McMillan > > Review comment: > > Lintian has a couple of warnings about your debian/copyroght file, > but I read them twice and I can't figure out what's triggering it. > It all looks fine to me...
I believe all those three Lintian warnings to be false. > rust-io-timer source: missing-debian-watch-file-standard [debian/watch] It is not mandatory for a package to have a watch file, and Lintian evidently is unaware that recent versions of uscan supports using debian/upstream/ as source of truth when debian/watch is omitted. > License is in Reference field (see bug#786450) > rust-io-timer source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3+ > [debian/copyright:31] > rust-io-timer source: missing-license-text-in-dep5-copyright GPL-3+ > [debian/copyright:74] These are already overridden (hence the reference to a bugreport). The issue is interpretation of "Stanza" (a.k.a. paragraph) vs. field in https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#stand-alone-license-stanza The License stanza "can be used to provide the full license text". Lintian requires the license field in the stand-alone license stanza to be a multi-line field, where I provide the information using a single-line license field and a Reference field. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
