Hi,
Could you please confirm that this is what you expected? In
particular, I was wondering whether the ">=" should be replaced with "=".
Well, the first answer is no. But your second suggestion is less good.
Let me explain. What I wanted you to do is think about what the
expectations are for liborthancframework-dev. And *if* a versioned
dependency was necessary, I was expecting something like >= major-
version-of-boost-during-build, << next-major-version-of-boost~. Such
that during the *next* boost transition, it will be lock stepping, but
not during regular Debian revisions. If a versioned dependency is *not*
necessary I'd like to understand what's the missing piece of the puzzle
then.
Thanks for trying to explain me. To be completely honest, I'm not
understanding the expectations here at all, and I don't feel confident
that I can translate this into the correct packaging changes.
I think it would be best to involve someone with stronger Debian
packaging expertise to help move this forward.
Regards,
Sébastien-
