On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Marc Haber
> | One would have to chown 701 /tmp/user/0. Would that open a too big
> | security hole in your opinion?
>
> I'd be somewhat unconfortable with it -- the point of pam-tmpdir is to
> have a completely private $TMP.
I understand that.
>It's probably not a security problem,
> though, as in it'll still be better than using /tmp as $TMP{,DIR}.
Is there any better possibility to solve the issue at hand?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]