This thread started with a posting that is archived at http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/2006-June/001652.html
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 08:03:18PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: > > > >which more generic string do you propose? > > > > What does the in-kernel code do now? I'm guessing it sends nothing; in > which case we can make it a command-line option to send anything, but > shouldn't do it by default. My proposal/request is to split the patch in two parts; an include filename part and the controversial "Vendor Class" part. Attached is the "filename part", in a follow-up the "Vendor Class" part. > -hpa Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
