> ok, great, this looks better now. I ignored all dependency problems and > hope that your new package does handle all of them ...
Thanks for taking care of this. I was expecting binutils-arm-none-eabi and binutils-riscv64-unknown-elf to eventually disappear from testing. Do I need to intentionally file RM bugs on testing for both of these source packages as well? Or should they fall out of testing in some period of time that hasn't passed yet? -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
