Control: tags 1129855 + patch
Control: tags 1129855 + pending

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for rsem (versioned as 1.3.3+dfsg-3.1) and uploaded 
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.

cu
Adrian
diffstat for rsem-1.3.3+dfsg rsem-1.3.3+dfsg

 changelog                |    7 +++++++
 patches/stdgnu++11.patch |    5 +++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -Nru rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/changelog rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/changelog	2023-12-18 14:58:36.000000000 +0200
+++ rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/changelog	2026-03-26 22:02:59.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+rsem (1.3.3+dfsg-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix FTBFS with Boost 1.90. (Closes: #1129855)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>  Thu, 26 Mar 2026 22:02:59 +0200
+
 rsem (1.3.3+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Team upload.
diff -Nru rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/patches/stdgnu++11.patch rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/patches/stdgnu++11.patch
--- rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/patches/stdgnu++11.patch	2023-12-18 14:58:36.000000000 +0200
+++ rsem-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/patches/stdgnu++11.patch	2026-03-26 22:02:54.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
-Description: port codebase to gnu++11.
+Description: port codebase to gnu++14.
  Since boost 1.83, it is necessary to build rsem with C++ 2011 standard.  This
  patch bumps the -std=gnu++98 passed by upstream Makefil to -std=gnu++11.  It
  should become unnecessary once upstream bumped to C++ 2011 or later, or when
  the package will not depend on boost anymore, in case this is in upstream's
  agenda; there is a merge request open upstream to bump to -std=gnu++17 in the
  meantime.
+ Boost 1.90 requires at least C++14.
 
 Author: Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
 Bug: https://github.com/deweylab/RSEM/pull/96
@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@
  # Compilation variables
  CXX = g++
 -CXXFLAGS += -std=gnu++98 -Wall -I. -I$(BOOST)
-+CXXFLAGS += -std=gnu++11 -Wall -I. -I$(BOOST)
++CXXFLAGS += -std=gnu++14 -Wall -I. -I$(BOOST)
  CPPFLAGS ?=
  
  LDFLAGS ?=

Reply via email to