The Debian NEW review of lpac 2.3.0-1 has been completed. Decision: ACCEPTED Reviewer: Andrew McMillan
Review comment: Hi, Accepted now, but something I missed in my earlier comments is your choice of naming for the licenses (probably upstream's choice really, but...) is non-standard. You use... Standard -----------------+---------- AGPL-v3.0-only | AGPL-3 LGPL-v2.1-only | LGPL-2.1 When a license is "-only" the standard (such as it is) is to omit that, and when it is GPL-2+ the standard is to add a "+", or more verbosely " or later". If you could fix this in your next upload, many automated license checking tools will be 0.00001% happier! Thanks! Full review details: https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/lpac
