On May 07, Jan Klemkow <[email protected]> wrote:
You still do not understand: I am not looking for somebody to help with the Debian package, which is as fine as it can be. You need to talk to the UPSTREAM maintainer to understand if they are still interested in maintaining and updating this or not.Sure. I created an account on salsa and would try to do the upgrade in a fork of salsa.debian.org/md/libretls. I just started this bugreport cause of hint from another debian maintainer.
If not, the options are:- we leave everything as it is (you have not explained why you need a newer version of libtls)
- somebody steps up to maintain libtls upstream- somebody finds a way to keep packaging libtls out of the "main" libretls package
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
