Hi Adam, On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 05:22:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 21:14 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sat, 2026-05-09 at 00:52 +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > > > > in > > > > https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/p/python-cryptography/ > > > > > > > > the arch:all package for python-cryptography 38.0.4-3~deb12u1 is > > > > missing, it's also not in the package index. The arch-specific > > > > packages and source are present. > > > > > > > > Severity minor because it's a -doc package in oldstable-security, > > > > but someone might still want to investigate how that happened. > > > > > > > > According to my logfiles, the file existed and was referenced in > > > > the index when I downloaded it on 2024-06-08 20:32:20 UTC. > > > > > > That's curious, because > > > https://snapshot.debian.org/package/python-cryptography/38.0.4-3~deb12u1/ > > > has no record of having seen it on 2023-03-10 when the arch- > > > specific packages were indexed. > [...] > > This is I believe a leftover from our test in > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/03/msg00072.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2023/03/msg00084.html > > > > So I think we can close this as there was never meant to have this > > version not beeing overriden. > > Fine by me, I'm just curious as to how Simon apparently downloaded > something that doesn't seem to have existed. :-)
Or othermwise maybe the archive team could clean up the remmenants of this experiment, so there won't be any furher confusion? (If so then we can reassign the bug to ftp.d.o?) Regards, Salvatore
