Quoting Juan (2026-05-12 01:17:43) > I'd like to start by packaging some small missing crates from your > 2003_* patches in rust-swc-core, while I catch up with the team > practices. > > > I'm thinking of starting with radix_fmt, and then dragonbox_ecma. > They are also in my node-rollup v4 build, so packaging them helps > both packages. > > Are you already working on any of those? > Happy to pick up others from the list too.
That sounds great. I follow the normal praxis in Debian of announcing as ITP bugreports the packages that I am working on to avoid duplicate work. I recommend that you do the same, and that you check for existing works e.g. at https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/prospective (which in my experience is faster to load and search through than other interfaces) instead of asking me directly: It slows us both down (a bit) to have a conversation about something that is already public knowledge, and I might not be the only one following this praxis. I am aware that the policy in the Rust team contradicts what I am recommending here - I have no interest in discussing pros and cons of Rust team policies, just sharing my opinion to help you form your own. Since you seem to be working from within the Rust team, another thing that is helpful is to update/upgrade packages maintained in that team which affects the swc packages. You can see the affected packages at https://bugs.debian.org/src:rust-swc-core Thanks a log for your help! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
