The Debian NEW review of mstpd 0.2.0-1 has been completed.

Decision: REJECTED
Reviewer: Reinhard Tartler

Review comment:

Thanks for your diligence while working on this package. I've had a
look through the source, and while it's mostly there, I have to reject
it for now because there are several discrepancies between the file
headers and the claims in debian/copyright.

Specifically, several files are licensed under the GPL-2 only, but are
currently documented as GPL-2+ (version 2 or later). For example:

- broadcom_xstrata/bcmexp.c: L7 says "Released under GPLv2"
- broadcom_xstrata/stp.soc: L2 says "Released under GPLv2"
- broadcom_xstrata/knet.soc: L2 says "Released under GPLv2"

This also applies to broadcom_xstrata/etc-init.d-stp.sh, which lacks an
explicit license grant but is presumably intended to be GPL-2 like its
neighbors. You'll need to ensure Phybridge Inc is correctly credited for
this file under the appropriate GPL-2 stanza.

Additionally, list.h contains a note stating it was "grubbed from linux
kernel source code". Since the Linux kernel is licensed under GPL-2
only, this header should also be treated as GPL-2 only rather than the
GPL-2+ listed in debian/copyright.

The broadcom_xstrata/* stanza in debian/copyright is also a bit too
broad, as it includes broadcom_xstrata/driver_deps.c, which actually is
licensed as GPL-2+ (L7: "version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
any later version"). You'll need to split these out into separate
stanzas to accurately reflect the "or later" status of each file.

Please update debian/copyright to match these findings and re-upload.

-rt

Full review details: https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/mstpd

Reply via email to