Hi Santiago,

Am Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:35:33PM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:51:34PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > [...]
> > My guess is that the bulk patch was hard to apply.
> 
> You guessed right. Everything mixed did not help.

Thanks to the missing Wifi in the trains from Hamburg I was able
to spent time on this. ;-)
 
> > where you expressed 3.5 years ago that it is known that there is a new
> > upstream version but you do not explain whether this is not packaged
> > intentionally.  Thus feel free to simply cherry pick from the repository
> > above depending from your intention with this package.
> 
> Yes, will do. The reason I've not upgraded to the new version is that
> (in addition to such thing not being really urgent)

I agree its not urgent and might be even intentional to show how to
upgrade a package.

> I also wanted to
> upgrade the copyright file, which in turn required to split the
> changes from Osamu into individual commits.
> 
> Your fork will make this definitely easier, thanks a lot.

Happa to help.
 
> When switching to DEP5, I also would like to state that the debian/*
> files are in the public domain. Have those files diverged enough from
> their very first original version that I can do that?

I have no idea but currently these files are not even specified.  I
simply added a paragraph that took the license from "Files: *".  My gut
feeling is that previous authors (noticed you added Ian) might be OK
with public domain.

> I think so, but I'm Cc:ing Ian to be sure (in fact, I approached him
> in Portland about this, maybe he remembers, but then I forgot to ask
> him in a more "official" way, he suggested that a gpg-signed email
> from him saying it's ok would be enough).
> 
> Regarding enabling MRs in hello: Sorry, no, I don't like the MR
> workflow for the packages I maintain.

OK.  Feel free to cherry pick your way.
 
> However, this does not mean at all that I can't point my git repo to
> your fork and cherry-pick from it. It just means I don't like the MR
> workflow and I also don't think it should be forced on maintainers by
> "group pressure".

Fine for me.
 
Thank you for your work on hello
    Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to