Hi Nilesh, On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 05:49:29PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I was planning to use something similar, but the messages in the IRC > mentioned must not, and hence I > decided to choose this instead :)
I'm sorry for having misguided you here. > This will still result in 9 bugs, but not with rc severity. The train of > thought above makes > sense to me. Sounds good. > diff --git a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > index 69467c4..92d4dbe 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > @@ -1381,8 +1381,9 @@ A Debian installation can combine packages from > multiple architectures. > The ``Multi-Arch`` field enables individual packages to declare their > support for this feature, and influences the way dependencies are > handled. It can be declared in binary package sections of a source > -package template control file and in binary package control files. The > -permitted field values are ``no`` (default), ``foreign``, ``same`` and > +package template control file and in binary package control files. > +Binary package stanzas for udebs do not make use of ``Multi-Arch``. > +The permitted field values are ``no`` (default), ``foreign``, ``same`` and > ``allowed``. Their semantics are described in the following sections. > > .. _s-f-Multi-Arch-no: I second this. Helmut
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
