hi, this bug was originally filed against debian-policy, Chris Waters pointed out that policy already discusses update-alternatives, and later on Josip Rodin reassigned the bug to developers-reference.
now, it's true that devref does not discuss update-alternatives, but it's also not clear to me that it should, given that it's already covered in policy. what more could be usefully said in devref that's not already in policy? perhaps there is some value in merely mentioning the existence of update-alternatives and linking to the relevant section in policy? or should we just mark this as wontfix? thanks, serafi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
