Hi Andrea, thanks for taking a look and for the suggestion - you're right, "service-health" is quite generic.
Since the tool specifically targets systemd units, I'm thinking of something that makes that focus clear, e.g. "svc-health", "systemd-svc-health" or "unit-health". Do you have a preference, or another idea? I'm happy to rename it before this goes any further. Thanks! Phillip Am Sa., 6. Juni 2026 um 16:54 Uhr schrieb Andrea Pappacoda < [email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Sat Jun 6, 2026 at 1:59 PM CEST, Phillip Fürpass wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected] > > Owner: Phillip Fuerpass <[email protected]> > > > > * Package name : service-health > > Version : 1.0.1 > > Upstream Author : Phillip Fuerpass <[email protected]> > > * URL : https://github.com/pfurpass/service-health > > * License : GPL-3.0+ > > Programming Lang: Bash > > Description : monitor systemd service health status > > > > service-health is a command-line tool that shows the status, uptime, > > memory, CPU and restart counts of all systemd services in one table, > > with JSON output and a watch mode for monitoring. > > The name is a bit generic. Would you maybe try to make it more specific? > > Bye! >
