Package: src:ocaml-containers Version: 3.18+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid
Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202606/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:ocaml-containers, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] debian/rules clean dh clean --with ocaml --buildsystem ocaml_dune dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dune clean dh_autoreconf_clean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_ocamlclean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_clean -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune debian/rules binary dh binary --with ocaml --buildsystem ocaml_dune dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_autoreconf -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_ocamlinit -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dune build -j 2 -p containers,containers-data dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dune runtest -j 2 -p containers,containers-data (cd _build/default/tests/cbor && ./t_appendix_a.exe ./appendix_a.json) ##### OK: 78 ok, 4 skip (cd _build/default/src/core/tests && ./check_labelled_mods.exe) labelled modules are consistent â (cd _build/default/tests/leb128 && ./t_leb128.exe) seed: 672fe2be26e9fb76 testing test leb128: running 22 tests⦠22 tests done in 0.022s OK (cd _build/default && src/mdx_runner.exe) ocaml-mdx returned 0 â (cd _build/default/tests/pvec && ./t.exe) seed: 3a9c3a9484821b91 testing containers.pvec: running 17 tests⦠17 tests done in 0.140s OK (cd _build/default/tests/data && ./t.exe) seed: c6a27c204b7fc7ff testing containers-data: running 476 tests⦠476 tests done in 1.186s OK (cd _build/default/tests/core && ./t.exe) seed: 2026bbc172871541 testing containers: running 1220 tests⦠1220 tests done in 2.672s OK create-stamp debian/debhelper-build-stamp dh_testroot -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_prep -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_auto_install -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dune install --destdir=debian/tmp --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ocaml/5.4.0 containers containers-data dh_ocamllibinstall -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_install -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_ocamldoc -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_installdocs -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_installchangelogs -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_installsystemduser -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_lintian -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_perl -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_link -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_strip_nondeterminism -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_compress -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_fixperms -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_missing -O--buildsystem=ocaml_dune dh_missing: warning: usr/doc/containers-data/odoc-config.sexp exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere dh_missing: warning: usr/doc/containers/odoc-config.sexp exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting The following debhelper tools have reported what they installed (with files per package) * dh_install: libcontainers-data-ocaml-dev (1), libcontainers-ocaml-dev (2) * dh_installdocs: libcontainers-data-ocaml-dev (2), libcontainers-ocaml-dev (2) If the missing files are installed by another tool, please file a bug against it. When filing the report, if the tool is not part of debhelper itself, please reference the "Logging helpers and dh_missing" section from the "PROGRAMMING" guide for debhelper (10.6.3+). (in the debhelper package: /usr/share/doc/debhelper/PROGRAMMING.md.gz) Be sure to test with dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B as the results may vary when only a subset is built If the omission is intentional or no other helper can take care of this consider adding the paths to debian/not-installed. make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 255 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
