Hello again,

> > > I'm unsure if the desync binary is also similarly broken when run in
> > > an environment using ZFS storage. Performing the build in an identical
> > > setup with ext4-backed storage works, so I'm not reporting this as an
> > > RC bug.
> > 
> > I wonder how I could reproduce this ? I guess I could setup a virtual 
> > machine
> > with ZFS-backed storage. I've never played with ZFS, so not entirely sure 
> > what
> > I am talking about here really.
> > 
> > For completeness, can you confirm the version of ZFS you are using ? I 
> > assume it'll
> > be the latest zfs-dkms (2.4.2-2) ?
> 
> I managed to setup a Debian Forky VM with a separate 20G qcow disk and 
> format/mount it as ZFS. Wasn't too
> much trouble.
> 
> But the test suite (built the package with gbp buildpackage on the VM 
> directly) on both ext4 and ZFS
> built and the tests ran fine.
> 
> I wonder if my ZFS setup isn't as "complicated" as yours ? Perhaps the VM 
> adds some perfection into the mix ?

It turns out upstream has found the root-cause, described it very well in the 
GitHub issue and fixed the issue
in https://github.com/folbricht/desync/pull/356

Once upstream releases a new version I will attempt to get it into Debian 
fairly quickly, or would you like it
sooner and for me to backport the patch ?


Thanks!

Chris

Reply via email to