tags 1139688 wontfix close 1139688 thanks On 11/06/26 2:33 pm, Matthias Geiger wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.136.2 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > Hi, > > for seedfiles I get the following warn: > > W: no-manual-page {usr/bin/systemd-tmpfiles}
In future please do specify the version as well, since this makes debugging easier. > This is wrong, as systemd-tempfiles is a symlink in this case. I don't think I am fully aligned on this. Shouldn't manpages also be symlinks in this case? Or a separate manpage for a symlink explicitly saying that the said `systemd-tmpfiles` is a symlink to `/usr/bin/seedfiles`? The usual case if the original manpage referring to all the binary names. As an example, the manpage of `egrep` is a symlink to the man for `grep` (same for `fgrep`) $ readlink /usr/share/man/man1/egrep.1.gz grep.1.gz same for `zcat` $ readlink /usr/share/man/man1/zcat.1.gz gzip.1.gz If there is nothing supplied, this adds to the confusion. In case of seedfiles, even doubly so as the same binary conflicts with another package. Thus, I am closing this with a wontfix. If you disagree or feel like more discussion is required, please re-open this bug and reply to/nudge me. Best, Nilesh
