Hi Sven,

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 10:23:52AM +0200, Sven Geuer wrote:
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], Debian Security Team 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> On Sat, 2026-05-30 at 09:42 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libvncserver
> > Version: 0.9.15+dfsg-4
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security upstream
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], Debian Security Team 
> > <[email protected]>
> > 
> > GHSA-v9pm-47h4-jcq8 (no CVE yet) describes:
> > Attacker-controlled heap out-of-bounds write in libvncclient Tight
> > decoder:
> > > A malicious (or man-in-the-middle) VNC server can force a connecting
> > > libvncclient to write attacker-controlled data past the end of its
> > > framebuffer. This is an out-of-bounds heap write with attacker-
> > > controlled length, contents, and offset. It needs no authentication
> > > (the attacker is the server), works in a default build with default
> > > settings, and fires from a single FramebufferUpdate the moment the
> > > victim connects. It crashes any client unconditionally (denial of
> > > service); we also demonstrated it overwriting an application callback
> > > pointer and redirecting execution to attacker-chosen code (code
> > > execution) under the default configuration.
> > https://github.com/LibVNC/libvncserver/security/advisories/GHSA-v9pm-47h4-jcq8
> 
> In the security advisory [1] upstream meanwhile lists CVE-2026-50538 as
> CVE ID of this issue, while there is still no CVE record available from
> cve.org [2]. Hence, I wonder whether or not one should already
> reference this CVE ID with fixing this bug.
> 
> What is the Security Team's position in that regard?

Given it is a github hosted project for which Github is a CNA, and the
CVE appeared in the GHSA, I'm inclined to associate it yes. I updated
the tracker entry already to make the link.

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to