Hi Alexander,

thank you for your prompt response.

Am Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 03:15:00PM +0000 schrieb Alexander Bürger:
> I am reading the bug reports but except for the first few times, when there 
> was a "mentor", my feeling from the communication with uploaders was that my 
> work on the package is not welcome. I had the impression that I am being met 
> either with silence or with replies akin to "don't care about what you 
> write". So I was passive.

Sorry about the bad experience.
 
> I am not sure how xfig and fig2sxd are related to photography, if that is 
> what "phototools" should suggest. Or is it just the maintainer group called 
> "phototools" that you think of?

I confirm that "photo" is probably not the most fitting name.  Its a
team that maintains quite a number of image processing tools and was the
closest I've found.  Otherwise we can also migrate the packaging to the
Debian team (=everything that does not fit into a specific team).
Finally its a suggestion I made and if you are in doubt I can move the
repository.  I just think its sensible to migrate to Salsa which
provides better chances for sponsoring (hopefully).
 
> I agree that separating program and packaging is a good idea. I can remove 
> the packaging, i.e. the debian directory, from the upstream repo(s).

It would be great if you could create a login on salsa.debian.org so I
could add you to the repository.

Kind regards and thank you for your cooperation
   Andreas.
 
> Cheers
> 
> Alexander
> 
> On 17 June 2026 09:21:37 UTC, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Source: fig2sxd
> >Version: 0.23-1
> >Severity: important
> >X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected], 
> >[email protected], Debian PhotoTools Maintainers 
> ><[email protected]>, Package Salvaging Team 
> ><[email protected]>
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would be interested in helping with fig2sxd, following the Package
> >Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. From what I
> >see, the package seems to meet the criteria for this process, and I'd
> >like to support keeping it maintained in Debian. As the Salvage process
> >suggests, here is a list of the criteria that I believe apply:
> >
> >  - Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the
> >    maintainer.
> >  - There are QA issues with the package.
> >
> >I believe the package would be fit into the Phototools team, and I
> >took the liberty to create the Salsa repository here[2]. If you choose
> >not to accept the ITS, I'd be more than happy to help you move it to
> >another location, such as debian/, or wherever you prefer. My goal is to
> >make it as easy as possible for you to join the team. I'd also be
> >delighted to assist in adding you as a team member if you could share
> >your Salsa login.
> >
> >I noticed that you are upstream of this software and maintained the
> >Debian packaging inside the upstream repository.  It has turned out that
> >this might be not an optimal way to connect to the Debian community.
> >Thus my offer to migrate the packaging to Salsa, which simplifies access
> >of Debian developers regarding sponsoring your package, run Salsa CI as
> >a QA means etc.  I hope you like this - if not feel free to merge my
> >changes fixing the open bugs, specifically the patch for the Makefile
> >which you might like to take over to your upstream code.
> >
> >Kind regards
> >    Andreas.
> >
> >[1] 
> >https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
> >[2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/fig2sxd
> >[3] 
> >https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/fig2sxd/-/blob/master/debian/patches/buildflags.patch?ref_type=heads
> >
> >
> >-- System Information:
> >Debian Release: forky/sid
> >  APT prefers testing
> >  APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), 
> > (5, 'experimental')
> >Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> >
> >Kernel: Linux 7.0.9+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
> >Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
> >Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not 
> >set
> >Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
> >Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> >LSM: AppArmor: enabled

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

Reply via email to