Package: build-essential
Version: 12.12
Severity: normal
Hello,
Nowadays, libpthread.so and such have moved from hurd-dev to
libc0.3-dev. And libc0.3-dev depends on hurd-dev nowadays anyway.
Could you drop the hurd-dev dependency as attached?
Thanks,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500,
'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500,
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-debug'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500,
'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64
Kernel: Linux 7.0.10+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/22 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages build-essential depends on:
ii dpkg-dev 1.23.7
ii g++ 4:15.2.0-5
ii gcc 4:15.2.0-5
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.42-16
ii make 4.4.1-3
build-essential recommends no packages.
build-essential suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Samuel
"...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly)."
(By Matt Welsh)
--- list.original 2026-06-24 20:44:29.685983126 +0200
+++ list 2026-06-24 20:44:41.769938420 +0200
@@ -59,9 +59,6 @@
the file
`/usr/share/doc/build-essential/essential-packages-list'
-hurd-dev [hurd-i386 hurd-amd64]
- Provides libpthread.so (and other such essential components).
-
END LIST OF PACKAGES
Here's the format definition:
