On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 22:40:20 +0200 Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote:
Since I made the effort to produce a patch, I'm interested why it wasn't considered. I notice you made 3 more uploads in the interim. Any reason you didn't consider this patch?Am 24.06.26 um 01:17 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Control: tags -1 + patch> > Seeing that the package in experimental already changed some of the > paths in debian/rules, the remaining bits should be fixed by the > attached debdiff. > Unfortunately I could not test build it, as the package currently FTBFS > [1]. Btw, I found it a bit odd, that some of the udev and systemd files > are installed via debian/rules and some via .install.> The package would benefit from some simplification and unification.> But in the interest of keeping the debdiff minimal I kept the current > approach. > > Would be great if you can apply the patch with one of your next uploads > (and as said, please check with lintian before you upload. If we missed > a spot it would trigger the aliased-location error)Seems there were more spots: E: ceph-common: aliased-location [sbin/] E: ceph-common: aliased-location [sbin/mount.ceph] E: ceph-fuse: aliased-location [sbin/] E: ceph-fuse: aliased-location [sbin/mount.fuse.ceph]I also noticed a usage of an aliased location in ceph-fs-common.install. But it appears this file is no longer needed and should be removed (the corresponding binary package has been folded into ceph-common a long time ago).Fixed/updated patch attach
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
