Niels Thykier:
Coming back to this bug again, I believe I exceeded my limit on this top even before I sent my previous email, and that is entirely on me. Apologies for that. I am done with this topic, and mostly just want to never come back to this again. However, in the interest in failing in a "somewhat" constructive manner, I will offer the following option:This is not were I want to spend my volunteer energy, [...]
I will take **one patch** (or, at your option, an MR) that spells out the dependencies as you (general sense, "you") believe them to be correct. I will merge it as long as it is a valid patch that updates all cases of the dependency - with no questions asked to order. It will be a patch or MR, so there is *no* interpretation of the desired change on my side. Interpretation would require more than minimal energy and I am not offering that.
If it lands any kind of controversy on the topic of the order, either the patch provider deals with it or the tech-ctte deals with it. Patch provider's call, defaulting to tech-ctte unless otherwise stated. If it is controversy is all in my head, the patch will unblock us and no further action is necessary from anyone. If there is a controversy, it will be flushed out and will delegated to someone that is not me, which is what I would need in that situation.
That is what I am willing to offer at this point on this topic. I am literally exhausted with `systemd` dependency discussions in `debhelper`.
On a closing note, I would like to stress that this is all about the topic and nothing about the involved parties nor our relationship.
Best regards, Niels
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
