On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 at 19:39, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see a bug here. > Just wait until fixed versions of udisks2 and libblockdev have entered > testing and do not blindly run "apt dist-upgrade/full-upgrade", > especially when it wants to remove half of your desktop environment.
I was under the impression this applied to unstable, not to testing, but I went and double checked and if you don't think this counts as a release critical bug (I would say yes if apt had not prevented the upgrade, but it did) then fair enough. On Sun, 5 Jul 2026 at 20:13, Sven Hoexter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 05, 2026 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Claudio wrote: > > Hi, > I'm sorry that you screwed up your installation, but > No worries, you didn't! I noticed the gnome removal (I've been there before...) and aborted the upgrade. > as Michael already explained it's not a bug on the Debian side. > > > Even on a FrankenDebian (which mine kind of is) this can't really be > worked around, as the "strictly earlier" rule means not even exfatprogs/sid > will be accepted. > > What you need is udisks2 (at least version 2.11.1-2) and libblockdev3 (at > least version 3.5.0-2) packages from unstable. That should help to resolve > the dependency issue, > in case there are no other issues. Ah, thanks; I had upgraded udisks2 but not libblockdev3 (tunnel vision); it worked now :)
