Il 12/07/2026 21:48, Michael Biebl ha scritto:
Hi Fabio,

thanks for the detailed bug report and analysis.

Am 12.07.26 um 20:19 schrieb Fabio Fantoni:

Please consider forwarding this upstream (https://github.com/polkit-org/ polkit/issues).


We usually prefer if bug reporters forward issues to upstream themselves, just in case upstream has more questions or want's you to test patches etc. (so we as Debian maintainer don't have to play bug proxy)

And given you basically did all the work in tracking this down, it would also be good if this was attributed to you properly.

Regards
Michael

Sorry, unfortunately, due to various unforeseen circumstances, including this one, out of four "small" packaging jobs I wanted to do today in 3 hours total, I was only able to complete one :( (bleachbit). Due to lack of time, upstream I only filed a quick issue on bleachbit (https://github.com/bleachbit/bleachbit/issues/2195) and only suggested posting upstream here. I recently started using LLM, and it helps me save time and achieve more results on many things, but I still have to spend a lot of time preparing local repos and test environments, explain what do, checking them, and guiding and correct them so they have a good chance of producing something useful and good. However, they often make mistakes and can waste time. And since I can do more with them than I would without them (in total), I'm getting into the "bad habit" of debugging and possibly fixing too many of the things I find. I thought about having Claude prepare the text for open the issue upstream, but then, in the end, checking what he generates, responding later, testing any upstream solutions, etc., I risked starting another thing that could take a lot of time. I'll see in the next days if I'm not too busy on other things if continue also this.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to