* Drew Parsons <[email protected]> [2026-07-31 16:12]:
On 2026-07-31 15:58, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:eccodes upstream has seen fit to make the library build date a part of their API via codes_get_build_date() Debian now has an enforced policy of reproducible builds, which is deliberately violated by eccodes through this codes_get_build_date()Should be fixed by #1143169 or do I miss something?No, 1143169 does not address this bug directly.
Can you explain why? #1143169 explicitly says that Alastair will request a binNMU of eccodes which will make it reproducible (according to my tests) which will allow it to migrate.
This issue is blocking cfgrib, which blocks a long chain of reverse dependencies.
I expect eccodes to migrate in 2-3 days, is there any urgency to do it earlier? In that case we can ask the release team for a migration hint.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
