I asked for an exception and it was granted, so I reduced severity to important.
I'm keen on fixing this. The simplest approach will be to revert the change that caused this. Le jeu. 13 août 2026 à 08:36, Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Jérémy, > > * Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> [2026-08-11 10:37]: > >did it actually regress, or was the previous version failure ignored ? > > It regressed as the one in forky is reproducible: > > https://reproduce.debian.net/amd64/forky.html#libnode137 > > >I'm about to open an upstream bug report, because they want to make > >their builds reproducible. > > > >The source of variation is likely to come from mksnapshot. > >Anyone willing to look into this will want to search for > >"predictable", "random_seed". > > I would be happy to help with this but currently I don't have the > compute resources for such a big package. > Fair enough... I often abuse porterboxes that have low activity to debug builds. > Cheers Jochen > > P.S.: Please note that bug authors are not automatically subscribed so > please remember to Cc me. > That's something I find very weird. If you send a bug report, you're supposed to get the replies ? Otherwise, what's the point ? Anyway, cc-ing you as requested ;)
