Hi Antonio,

On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 06:55:54PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 02:31:52PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: goaccess
> > Version: 1:1.10.1-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security upstream
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], Debian Security Team 
> > <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The following vulnerabilities were published for goaccess.
> > 
> > CVE-2026-54715[0]:
> > | GoAccess is a real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer that
> > | runs in a terminal in *nix systems or through the browser. In
> > | version 1.10.2, parse_browser assumes the matched browser token
> > | begins with Opera and moves a trailing version substring to match
> > | plus five, allowing a crafted User-Agent in a processed access log
> > | to write one to four attacker-influenced bytes beyond the heap
> > | allocation and corrupt or crash GoAccess. This issue is fixed in
> > | version 1.11.
> > 
> > 
> > CVE-2026-55768[1]:
> > | GoAccess is a real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer that
> > | runs in a terminal in *nix systems or through the browser. Prior to
> > | version 1.11, the built-in WebSocket server narrows a 64-bit
> > | extended frame length into the signed 32-bit WSFrame.payloadlen
> > | field before enforcing the maximum frame size, allowing an
> > | unauthenticated remote client to bypass the guard and force an
> > | approximately 18-exabyte allocation request that terminates the
> > | process. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.
> > 
> > 
> > CVE-2026-55777[2]:
> > | GoAccess is a real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer that
> > | runs in a terminal in *nix systems or through the browser. Prior to
> > | 1.11, the parse_ios() function uses an attacker-controlled keyword-
> > | to-OS offset as both the source offset and copy length for memmove,
> > | allowing a crafted User-Agent in a processed access log to read up
> > | to approximately 4 KB beyond the heap allocation and conditionally
> > | crash GoAccess. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.
> > 
> > 
> > If you fix the vulnerabilities please also make sure to include the
> > CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids in your changelog entry.
> 
> I just uploaded a new upstream release that includes the fixes for these
> to unstable.

Thank you very much, updating the metadata on our end.

> I also have a trixie branch where I cherry picked the individual fixes.
> I'm attaching the full diff and the individual patches here, LMK what
> you think. Are you releasing a DSA for those, or should I go for a
> stable update?

I think a point release update would be enough here, we did already
mark the issues no-dsa in the tracker.

Thanks for your work!

Regards,
Salvatore

Reply via email to