On lun, 2006-07-10 at 18:11 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 09:54:22AM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > On lun, 2006-07-10 at 12:39 +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: > > > + * New upstream (Closes: #296874, #342518, #293595, #313902, > > > #260517) > > > > Those are not requests for a new upstream version... > > OK, I see your point but it does fix them or otherwise incorporate > them. I guess I should have split it out to say how it fixes it, but > it felt a little redundant. Should I fix it somehow, or just "don't > do that again"?
The usual way to write the changelog is something like: * New upstream (Closes: #342518) - fix german translation (Closes: #313902) ... If you already uploaded don't bother for that one. Anyway, is there anything justifying a NMU without letting a week to the maintainer on that package? New versions are not a NMU reason usually... Cheers, Sebastien Bacher -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
