Source: chkrootkit Version: 0.59-1 Severity: important User: [email protected] Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed that it regularly fails, at least on s390x. I triggered 5 runs and 2 failed. I hope I copy/pasted the relevant part below.
Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages, are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these tests. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information from our infrastructure. Paul https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/chkrootkit/testing/s390x/74480411/532s ** FAIL: Testing: all-tests-can-find-something-01 (chkrootkit -p /tmp/clean) done: FAIL
532s *** FAIL was with config set to: 532s RUN_DAILY=true 532s RUN_DAILY_OPTS='-q' 532s DIFF_MODE=true 532s MAILTO=root 532s 532s *** Reason(s) for failure follows 532s Result: FAIL 532s532s Missing: ^Checking `sshd'\.\.\. INFECTED but disabled$
532s *** Unexpected (unmatched) lines follow (for info): 532s Checking `sshd'... INFECTED 532s erspan0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s gre0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s gretap0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s ip6_vti0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s ip6gre0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s ip6tnl0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s ip_vti0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s sit0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets 532s tunl0: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
