Hi Zlatko,
Apologies for the delay, your message was flagged as spam on my end and
I don't check my spam folder very often...
Content analysis details: (3.6 points, 3.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
2.0 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
-0.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?213.191.128.133>]
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?213.191.142.123>]
Zlatko Calusic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I used XEmacs Debian package for many years and it had this same
> problem, but then at some point in time somebody found a way to fix
> it. It would be great if that same fix could be applied to the
> emacs-snapshot package.
> For additional reading, here's the link to the archive of my first
> call for help (old!):
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/43950
Thanks for the report and the info, I'll have a look at this sometime
during the summer... :-)
Cheers,
--
,''`.
: :' : Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
