Lorenzo schrob: > Only thing to be careful is that I > think the service can remain stuck in exectop status for long time if > there is some misbehaving runit service that does not stop at all. > I think that will result in a systemd timeout of 60 (or 180?) seconds, > but I'm not sure...
Yes. TimeoutStopSec ?= DefaultTimeoutStopSec ?= 90s, according to the
manpage.
And I think that waiting a long time is indeed the only reasonable
default for a supervisor, because a misbehaving service that does not
stop at all is indistinguishable from a properly behaving service that
just takes very long to stop. Noticing the former case and fixing the
underlying bug should be left as an execise for the humans.
Thanks again for maintaining runit. :)
cheers,
Jan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
